Static PagesPeople and Places |
Monday, December 28. 2009MawwiageTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
We had a friend who actually trained as a celebrant, but then found that he wasn’t allowed to practise. There were apparently already an adequate number of celebrants available to represent his “community.” I was surprised that there was a quota, and also a bit offended that there are rules somewhere about what constitutes a community worth representing. What’s worse is that the celebrant we chose for our wedding, who passed these arbitrary criteria, lacked basic skills. She was very nice, but she arrived late for the ceremony, and then sent in the wrong forms. This story, your story, and the stories of the people in the news article you link to, suggest to me that its time to update the rules. Being a celebrant should be based on an objective evaluation of competence and nothing else. Arriving late has to be the king of things not to do, really. I should probably motivate myself to examine the legislation more closely - my understanding is certainly that a lot of the DIA’s criteria are not necessarily supported by the legislation itself, or anything parliament has authorised. If that’s the case, it’s really something to poke an MP about. |
QuicksearchArchivesTag SoupAda ada android bikes ceph economics egroupware eve farming fatherhood feminism football french funambol gym hi-fi Isis Jaques java judo lca2010 lca2012 lego Lias linux Maire mangling language new zealand oracle perl phil ochs pixar postgresql question of the day racism rails snark sony-ericsson syncml sysadmin typo uk venting vignette virtualisation wave wtc bombing
Categories |